USPTO serial 75796508
MSM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MSM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Russell B. Miller
PATENT DEPT QUALCOMM INCORPORATED5775 MOREHOUSE DRSAN DIEGO, CA 92121-1714UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | WIRELESS COMMUNICATION APPARATUS, NAMELY MODEMS, CELLULAR TELEPHONES, WIRELESS LOCAL LOOP TELEPHONES AND PERSONAL COMMUNICATION SERVICES PCS HANDSETS AND MANUALS AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR, RADIO FREQUENCY RF AND INTERMEDIATE FREQUENCY IF TRANSCEIVER CIRCUIT ASSEMBLIES, AND ANALOG AND DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSING CIRCUIT ASSEMBLIES FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION APPARATUS; COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR MODEMS, WIRELESS LOCAL LOOP TELEPHONES, CELLULAR TELEPHONES, PERSONAL COMMUNICATION SERVICES PCS HANDSETS AND PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANT PDA DEVICES PROCESSORS; INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR SIGNAL PROCESSING IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION APPARATUS, INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND COMPUTER HARDWARE FOR CELLULAR TELEPHONES, RADIOTELEPHONES, AND HAND HELD COMPUTERS; SOFTWARE FOR CELLULAR TELEPHONES, RADIOTELEPHONES AND HAND HELD COMPUTERS; COMPUTER HARDWARE FOR CELLULAR TELEPHONES AND RADIOTELEPHONES; MODEMS; AND AMPLIFIERS; SIGNAL COMPRESSION AND DECOMPRESSION INSTRUMENTS, VOICE CODERS AND DECODERS, NAMELY VOCODERS, AND SIGNAL COMPRESSION AND DECOMPRESSION SOFTWARE AND TECHNICAL MANUALS SOLD AS A UNIT THEREWITH | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 4, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 28, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 27, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |