Drawing for RUS DIRECT UNIFORM SALES

USPTO serial 75796703

RUS DIRECT UNIFORM SALES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRAY, CAROLYN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RUS DIRECT UNIFORM SALES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PATRICIA B. HOGAN

PATRICIA B HOGAN KEATING MUETHING & KLEKAMP PLL1400 PROVIDENT TWRONE E FOURTH STCINCINNATI, OH 45202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail services by solicitation by sales agent and mail order catalog service, in the field of clothing, footwear, headwear and related accessoriesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 14, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 26, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 15, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 28, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 14, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 7, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance