USPTO serial 75796785
CLUB ZERO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLUB ZERO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CA
WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CA
Westlake Village, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rochelle D. Alpert
ROCHELLE D ALPERT BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLPSPEAR ST TWRONE MARKETSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PERSONALIZED RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING BOOKS, MAGAZINES, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, COMPUTER HARDWARE AND PERIPHERALS, HEALTH AND BEAUTY PRODUCTS, JEWELRY, LEATHER GOODS, CLOTHING, ACCESSORIES, HATS AND SHOES, MUSIC, VIDEOS, TOYS AND GAMES, ELECTRICAL APPLIANCES, FLOWERS, VEHICLES, OFFICE SUPPLIES, SCHOOL SUPPLIES, PAPER GOODS, SPORTING GOODS, MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS, HOME AND GARDEN FURNISHINGS AND ACCESSORIES, ARTS AND COLLECTIBLES, FOOD AND BEVERAGES, TELEPHONES AND TELEPHONE SERVICES, TRAVEL GEAR AND SERVICES, AND HOUSEWARES, VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; PROVIDING ADVERTISING FOR THIRD PARTIES, FEATURING CONSUMER TARGETING AND PROFILING BY MEANS OF A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS BY PROVIDING TARGETED AND PERSONALIZED HYPERLINKS TO THE SITES OF THIRD PARTIES BY MEANS OF A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | PROVIDING PERSONALIZED AND CUSTOMIZED MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; PERSONALIZED AND CUSTOMIZED ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICES; PROVIDING ON-LINE CHAT ROOMS FOR TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AMONG COMPUTER USERS CONCERNING GENERAL INTEREST TOPICS; FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NETZERO, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NETZERO, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NetZero, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named CLUB ZERO
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 8, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 13, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 12, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 22, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |