USPTO serial 75797005
BIG DOG ENTERTAINMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 23, 2004
- Examiner
- BERK, STEVEN R
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BIG DOG ENTERTAINMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Santa Barbara, CA
Santa Barbara, CA
THE WALKING COMPANY HOLDINGS, INC.
SANTA BARBARA, CA
Other trademarks owned by THE WALKING COMPANY HOLDINGS, INC.
Santa Barbara, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KURT KOENIG
Kurt Koenig Koenig & AssociatesPO Box 1140Summerland, CA 93067-1140UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | television show, videotape, and motion picture film production all featuring music; development of television shows, videotapes, and motion picture films, namely, script writing services, video editing, and television syndication | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 3, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Big Dog Holdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Big Dog Holdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by THE WALKING COMPANY HOLDINGS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Big Dog Holdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named BIG DOG ENTERTAINMENT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 6, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 27, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 7, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 13, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 11, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 23, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |