USPTO serial 75797017
Serial No. 75797017
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRACEY, KAREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 75797017?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heidi A. Schiller
HEIDI A SCHILLER108 PLEASANT STLEXINGTON, MA 02421UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | refined metals and metal concentrates namely copper, molybdenum, zinc, and uranium | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | distributorships in the field of metals | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | metal smelting and refining services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | the operation of a mining business; the operation of a metals distribution business; the operation of a metal smelting and refining business; the operation of a mineral exploration business; the operation of mines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 16, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |