Drawing for GESTALT BALANCE

USPTO serial 75797538

GESTALT BALANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2545757Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 12, 2002
Examiner
KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GESTALT BALANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009DATA PROCESSING COMPUTER PROGRAMS, NAMELY, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN DEVELOPING WORKSHOPS TO IMPROVE THE CORPORATE CULTURE BY INCREASING INNOVATIVE CAPABILITY, COMMUNICATION AND PRODUCTIVITY IN BUSINESS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN TRAINING PROGRAMS DESIGNED TO IMPROVE THE CORPORATE CULTURE BY INCREASING INNOVATIVE CAPABILITY, COMMUNICATION AND PRODUCTIVITY; AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR EVALUATING BUSINESSES TO DETERMINE METHODS TO IMPROVE THE CORPORATE CULTURE BY INCREASING INNOVATIVE CAPABILITY, COMMUNICATION AND PRODUCTIVITYSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—
035BUSINESS MANAGEMENT CONSULTATION SERVICES, NAMELY, CONSULTATION IN THE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF WORKSHOPS AND IN THE PLANNING AND REALIZATION OF PROJECTS TO IMPROVE THE CORPORATE CULTURE BY INCREASING INNOVATIVE CAPABILITY, COMMUNICATION AND PRODUCTIVITYSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—
041DEVELOPING AND HOLDING SEMINARS AND WORKSHOPS FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF IMPROVEMENT OF THE CORPORATE CULTURE BY INCREASING INNOVATIVE CAPABILITY, COMMUNICATION AND PRODUCTIVITYSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—
042COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN FOR OTHERS; RENTAL OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SERVICES OF STUDIOS FOR OTHERSSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 21, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2005C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Feb 2, 2005CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 2, 2005CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 7, 2004CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Aug 11, 2004PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 12, 2002R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 18, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 28, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 22, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 3, 20001.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Apr 3, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance