Drawing for PLYTEX

USPTO serial 75797737

PLYTEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPRUILL, DARRYL M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PLYTEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin J. Beran

MARTIN J BERAN SCHWEITZER CORNMAN GROSS & BONDELL LLP230 PARK AVE STE 2200NEW YORK, NY 10169UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020PLASTIC LABELING MATERIALS, NAMELY PRINTED AND NON-PRINTED PLASTIC LABELS, PROVIDED WITH A THERMOPLASTIC ADHESIVE LAYER FOR APPLYING ON TEXTILEACTIVE—
024TEXTILE LABELING MATERIALS, NAMELY PRINTED AND NON-PRINTED TEXTILE LABELS, PROVIDED WITH A THERMOPLASTIC ADHESIVE LAYER AND A SELF-ADHESIVE LAYERACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 2, 2001ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Nov 22, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 22, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 31, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 18, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 31, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 29, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 18, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 11, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance