USPTO serial 75797848
BIOVISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYES, GINA CLARK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIOVISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Co. Wicklow, IE
Co. Wicklow, IE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy M. Kenny
TIMOTHY M KENNY ARNOLD WHITE & DURKEEP O BOX 4433HOUSTON, TX 77210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consultation services, business management services, business management advice services, business planning and research services, business advice in the field of company acquisitions, company mergers, company alliances, product acquisitions and marketing; providing strategic business information and business statistical information; arranging and conducting business conferences in the field of company acquisitions, company mergers, company alliances, product acquisitions and marketing | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial services in the nature of venture capital investment; financial research analysis; consultation relating to venture capital and investment services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 19, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 26, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 24, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |