Drawing for ENERGYNOW!

USPTO serial 75797915

ENERGYNOW!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YARD, JOHN S
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENERGYNOW!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael F. Krieger

MICHAEL F KRIEGER KIRTON & MCCONKIE1800 EAGLE GATE TWR60 E S TEMPLESALT LAKE CITY, UT 84145

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009database management and spreadsheet software programs for trading, management, and accounting needs of companies which trade, obtain, store and deliver energy, not to include - remote gathering via public or private network of operating information from electric or thermal power generation products of associated facilities, controlling operation via public or private network of power generation products or associated facilities, or management of energy usage of others via public private networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 2004MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 1, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 17, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 23, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 4, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 4, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 5, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 1, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 3, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 15, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 11, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance