Drawing for PLAYWATCH

USPTO serial 75797997

PLAYWATCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PLAYWATCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KENT JORDAN

AMY LEE BRADY KENT JORDAN ESQTHE US CORPORATION COMPANY80 STATE STALBANY, NY 12207-2544

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for monitoring and recording use of the computer it is operating on and tracking / recording the computers activities on the global computer network that may be downloaded from a global computer networkACTIVEApr 1, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 6, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 27, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 28, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 22, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 15, 2001SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 9, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 16, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 24, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 22, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 18, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 8, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance