Drawing for EPRIME

USPTO serial 75798149

EPRIME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EPRIME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dyann L. Kostello

DYANN L KOSTELLO MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP100 E WISCONSIN AVEMILWAUKEE, WI 53202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036financial data processing services designed to enable a financial institution to provide financial services by way of a global computer network, telephone, automated teller machines, and kiosks; namely, electronic processing of transactions for loans and leases, processing of bill payment data; processing of debit card transactions; electronic processing of transactions for securities trades; cash management services; processing of insurance claims and application for insurance; processing of automated teller machine transactions; electronic funds transfer; check processing, and deposit account processingACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely, designing and implementing network web pages for others and distribution of plastic debit cardsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 27, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 27, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 5, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 3, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 5, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 21, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 9, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 27, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 10, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 22, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance