USPTO serial 75798263
PEPPERBALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 13, 2003
- Examiner
- BRACEY, KAREN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with PEPPERBALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SAN DIEGO, CA
San Diego, CA
Lake Forest, IL
San Diego, CA
ADVANCED TACTICAL ORDINANCE SYSTEMS, LLC
Fort Wayne, IN
Other trademarks owned by ADVANCED TACTICAL ORDINANCE SYSTEMS, LLC
SAN DIEGO, CA
SAN DIEGO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew J. Gryzlo
Matthew J. Gryzlo BARNES & THORNBURG LLPONE NORTH WACKER DRIVESUITE 4400CHICAGO, IL 60606-2833Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 013 | non-lethal weaponry, namely, non-lethal projectiles; launch devices for non-lethal projectiles; non-lethal substances for use in non-lethal projectiles, namely, liquid and non-liquid materials, namely, water, inert or irritant powders, Oleoresin Capsicum, marker dyes [, irritants and powdered or granulated metals, namely, Bismuth ] | ACTIVE | Nov 29, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JAYCOR TACTICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by JAYCOR
- Other trademarks owned by UNITED TACTICAL SYSTEMS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by JAYCOR
- Other trademarks owned by ADVANCED TACTICAL ORDINANCE SYSTEMS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by JAYCOR TACTICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by JAYCOR TACTICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 013
- Similar marks named PEPPERBALL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2023 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 22, 2023 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 22, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 16, 2023 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | C.7C | NEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 28, 2021 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2021 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jul 22, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 7, 2021 | WDRL | OTQR WITHDRAWAL FROM PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 2, 2020 | C.7C | NEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 25, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 11, 2020 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 8, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 13, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 13, 2013 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 26, 2010 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2010 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 18, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 13, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 13, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 18, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 4, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 16, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |