USPTO serial 75798809
ESSENTIALS BY MIMI MATERNITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ESSENTIALS BY MIMI MATERNITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul J. Kennedy
PAUL J KENNEDY PEPPER HAMILTON LLPEIGHTEENTH AND ARCH STS3000 TWO LOGAN SQPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2799Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Maternity wear, namely, blouses, suits, blazers, jumpers, dresses, hats, jackets, long and short coats, sweaters, lingerie, scarves, ties, bows, collars, swimwear, exercise wear, tennis suits, jumpsuits, tops, tunics, shorts, skirts, jeans and short sets | ACTIVE | Aug 25, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |