USPTO serial 75798828
GROWING FAMILY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GROWING FAMILY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carol J. Hamilton
CAROL J HAMILTON HERZOG, CREBS & MCGHEE, LLP515 N 6TH ST24TH FLST LOUIS, MO 63101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Mounted and unmounted photographs; magazines concerning infant and family issues, newsletters concerning infants and family issues; brochures concerning infant and family issues; books on infant and family issues; printed awards certificates | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |