USPTO serial 75798987
AUDIOMONSTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AUDIOMONSTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Vancouver, B.C., CA
Vancouver, B.C., CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Seann W Hallisky
SEANN W HALLISKY STEINER NORRIS PLLC3930 TWO UNION SQ 601 UNION STSEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ONLINE INFORMATION FEATURING ENTERTAINMENT AND NEWS; PRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF ONLINE ARTISTIC PERFORMANCES AND SHOWS FOR DISTRIBUTION ON GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS; PRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF LIVE ARTISTIC PERFORMANCES AND SHOWS FOR DISTRIBUTION ON GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS; PROVIDING A WEBSITE ON GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS FEATURING INFORMATION IN THE FIELDS OF ENTERTAINMENT AND ONLINE LINKS TO OTHER ENTERTAINMENT WEBSITES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 7, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |