Drawing for TRUECHANNEL

USPTO serial 75799357

TRUECHANNEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRUECHANNEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael D. Fishman

MICHAEL D FISHMAN RADER, FISHMAN & GRAUER, PLLC1533 N WOODWARD AVE STE 140BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009CABLES, NAMELY, ELECTRICAL CABLES, COAXIAL CABLES, TWISTED-PAIR CABLES, COMPUTER CABLES, AND FIBER OPTIC CABLES FOR THE TRANSMISSION OF DATA AND/OR POWER; CABLE COMPONENTS, NAMELY, CONNECTORS, PUNCH-DOWN BLOCKS, JACKS, PLUGS, PATCH CORDS, PATCH PANELS, CABLE MANAGEMENT COMPONENTS FOR ENHANCEMENT OF SIGNAL TRANSMISSION, NAMELY, TRAYS, DIVIDERS, WRAPS, RACKS, BRACKETS, CHANNELS, RINGS AND CLIPS, OUTLET HOUSING AND FACEPLATES AND SURGE PROTECTORSACTIVE
036PRODUCT PERFORMANCE WARRANTY SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING WARRANTIES ON DATA CABLE SYSTEMS AND PROCESSING WARRANTY CLAIMS FOR DATA CABLE SYSTEMSACTIVE
041EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING VOCATIONAL EDUCATION, PROVIDING EDUCATIONAL DEMONSTRATIONS, PROVIDING SEMINARS, PROVIDING WORKSHOPS, PROVIDING INTERACTIVE AND SELF-PACED DISTANCE LEARNING OVER A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, ALL IN THE FIELD OF SELECTION AND INSTALLATION OF DATA CABLE; TRAINING IN THE SELECTION AND INSTALLATION OF DATA CABLEACTIVE
042CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF SELECTION, INSTALLATION AND PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT OF DATA CABLE SYSTEMS; THIRD-PARTY TESTING OF GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS FOR THE PURPOSE OF CERTIFICATION IN THE FIELD OF DATA CABLE SYSTEMSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 9, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 5, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 23, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Oct 24, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 1, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 30, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 25, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 25, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 24, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 15, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance