Drawing for AUTHENTIC TINY TANK

USPTO serial 75799598

AUTHENTIC TINY TANK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FICKES, JERI J
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AUTHENTIC TINY TANK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith E. Sharkin

KEITH E SHARKIN NIMS, HOWES, COUISON, HANSEN & LACKERT605 THIRD AVESTE 3500NEW YORK, NY 10158

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Infants' and children's sleeveless rompersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 27, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 28, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 28, 2001EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 11, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 10, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 10, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 22, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 5, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance