USPTO serial 75800123
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
MARKHAM, ONTARIO, CA
MARKHAM, ONTARIO, CA
Markham, CA
MARKHAM, ONTARIO L3R 9T9, CA
MARKHAM, ONTARIO, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE R REPPER
GEORGE R REPPER LAUBSCHER & LAUBSCHER1425 K ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS, VITAMINS, MINERAL SUPPLEMENTS, HERBAL SUPPLEMENTS, HERB TEA FOR MEDICINAL PURPOSES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 5, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 5, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 1, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 24, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |