USPTO serial 75800618
NAPLES GRANDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2515760Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 4, 2001
- Examiner
- DALIER, LAURIEL
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NAPLES GRANDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BOCA RATON, FL
NEW YORK, NY
Chicago, IL
Chicago, IL
BOCA RATON, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah Lee-Serafini, Esq.
Deborah Lee-Serafini Lydecker Diaz1201 Brickell Avenue, 5th FloorMiami, FL 33131UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | GOLF CLUB SERVICES, GOLF COURSES, GOLF TOURNAMENTS, INSTRUCTION IN THE FIELD OF GOLF, ALL IN NAPLES, FLORIDA | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 31, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PANTHERS GREY OAKS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PANTHERS GREY OAKS, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by LeHill Partners, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by LeHill Partners, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by PANTHERS GREY OAKS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named NAPLES GRANDE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 17, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 21, 2007 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 25, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 18, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 28, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 27, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 23, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |