USPTO serial 75801021
SATBOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SATBOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sunnyvale, CA
Sunnyvale, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven F. Caserza
ALDO J TEST DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP4 EMBARCADERO CTR STE 3400SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4187UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Optical communication systems and components, comprising communications apparatus and appliances, namely, optical transmitters, optical receivers, amplifiers, preamplifiers, power supplies; status monitoring and control units; splitters, combiners, access, interface, and multiplexer nodes; digital compression units and computer hardware and software; modulation units; headend compression devices, multiplexers, scramblers, and modulators; transmitters for use with broadband networks, namely fiber optic, cable, satellite, and wireless networks; headend software for the management and transmission of data; broadband network interfaces; network element management hardware and software; and manuals and parts related thereto | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Enabling the provision and use of high speed broadband communication services by providing access to fiber optic cable, cable, satellite, and wireless systems to communication system providers and users | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 24, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 18, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |