Drawing for VIRTUAL MEDICAL CAMPUS

USPTO serial 75801161

VIRTUAL MEDICAL CAMPUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VIRTUAL MEDICAL CAMPUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Megan D Dortenzo

MEGAN D DORTENZO STEPTOE & JOHNSONBANK ONE CTRP O BOX 2190CLARKSBURG, WV 26302-2190

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed instructional, educational, and teaching materials, namely, books, workbooks, manuals, photographs, study guides, procedural guides, instruction guides, and tests in the field of natural and man-made mass disasters, mass disaster planning, preparedness and response for use in educating, training, and certifying first responders, hospital and medical personnel, and government agency coordinators in the preparation for and response to both man-made and natural mass disastersACTIVE—
035Business services, namely, business management consultation services rendered to first responders, hospitals, and government agencies preparing for and responding to both natural and man-made mass disasters; and advertising agency services, namely, promoting the goods and services of others in the field of scientific, photographic, and optical instruments, sound and photographic recordings, and data processing and computer equipment used in the preparation for and response to both natural and man-made mass disastersACTIVE—
038Telecommunication services, namely, providing radio and television broadcasting services via public airwaves, wireless technologies, and a global computer network; and providing global computer network website and telecommunication services, namely, providing reliable and secure connections to a global computer network for the transfer of information pertaining to natural and man-made mass disasters and mass disaster preparedness, planning, and responseACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 20, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 5, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 3, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 27, 2002DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 9, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 2002DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2002EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 13, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 8, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 29, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 29, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 9, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance