USPTO serial 75801163
VMC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, HEATHER
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VMC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Megan D. Dortenzo
MEGAN D DORTENZO STEPTOE & JOHNSONBANK ONE CTRP O BOX 2190CLARKSBURG, WV 26302-2190Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed instructional, educational, and teaching materials, namely, books, workbooks, manuals, photographs, study guides, procedural guides, instruction guides, and tests in the field of natural and man-made mass disasters, mass disaster planning, preparedness and response for use in educating training, and certifying first responders, hospital and medical personnel, and government agency coordinators in the preparation for and response to both man-made and natural mass disasters | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, providing radio and television broadcasting services via public airwaves, wireless technologies, and a global computer network; providing telecommunications connections to a dedicated computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by West Virginia University Research Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by West Virginia University Research Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named VMC
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 19, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 19, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 16, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 18, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 25, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |