USPTO serial 75801593
GATECRASHER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GATECRASHER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leslie Bertagnolli
LESLIE BERTAGNOLLI BAKER & MCKENZIEONE PRUDENTIAL PLZ130 E RANDOLPH DR STE 3500CHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PRERECORDED VIDEOCASSETTE TAPES FEATURING ANIMATED CARTOON CHARACTERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | STATIONERY NOTEBOOKS, PENS, RUBBER STAMPS, AND PRINTED PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY COMIC STRIPS, COMIC BOOKS, STICKERS, DECALS | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | BED AND TABLE LINENS | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | HEADWARE, FOOTWARE AND CLOTHING, NAMELY SHIRTS, SWEATERS AND JACKETS | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | TOYS, NAMELY TOY ACTION FIGURES, STUFFED TOYS, PLUSH TOYS, WIND-UP TOYS, AND GAMES, NAMELY ARCADE GAMES, BOARD GAMES | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | ONLINE INFORMATION SERVICES, NAMELY COMIC STRIPS AND COMIC BOOKS DISTRIBUTED BY MEANS OF A WEB SITE ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF PRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF MOTION PICTURE FILMS AND TELEVISION SHOWS IN THE FIELD OF AN ANIMATED CARTOON SHOW | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Gareb Shamus Enterprises Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named GATECRASHER
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 11, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |