Drawing for NUTRASPHERE

USPTO serial 75801710

NUTRASPHERE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with NUTRASPHERE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN A. CLIFFORD

JOHN A CLIFFORD MERCHANT & GOULD PCP O BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Nutraceuticals for use as a dietary supplement containing oils, seeds, nuts, vitamins, minerals, herbs and protein in liquid, powder and capsule form; Wheat-based, flour-based, and dairy-based nutraceuticals for use as a dietary supplement; Dietary food supplements containing oils, seeds and nuts, namely, meal replacement bars and drinks; Vitamin, mineral and protein supplements containing oils, seeds and nuts; Baby food containing oils, seeds and nuts, namely, infant formula, cereal, cookies and biscuitsACTIVE—
029Food products, namely, jams, jellies, peanut butter, fruit based snack food, vegetable and fruit salads, soups, soup mixes, olive oil, milk, yogurt, jellies, cream, butter, margarine, frozen meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables, processed nuts, processed edible seeds, cheese and potato chips; Dairy-based food beverages containing oils, seeds and nuts; Dairy based food beveragesACTIVE—
030Food products, namely, breakfast cereal, flour-based chips, grain-based chips, tortilla chips, crackers, biscuits, bread, muffins, ready to eat cereal derived food bars, cereal based snack food, granola-based snack bars, canned pasta, ketchup, mustard, relish, vinegar, honey, tomato sauces, barbeque sauces, table syrup, spices, ice milk, mayonnaise, candy, chocolate bars, chewing gum, ice cream, ice cream bars, sandwiches made of fish, hamburger, hot dogs, cheese, poultry, vegetables or meats, frozen meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; Processed wheat and wheat-based snack foods containing oils, seeds and nuts; Flour and flour-based chips containing oils, seeds and nuts; Non dairy-based food beveragesACTIVE—
032Fruit juices; Non-alcoholic fruit drinks; Soft drinks; Mineral, aerated and flavored waters; Vegetable juices and aerated fruit juices; Fruit flavored soft drinks; Fruit punch; Lemonade; Aloe vera drinks and juices; Wheat-based food beverages, namely, beer; Sweet cider, all containing oils, seeds and nutsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 25, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 24, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 24, 2008CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 23, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 30, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 29, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 29, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 29, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 8, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 4, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 2, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 28, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 29, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 20, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 20, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 29, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 10, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 10, 2005CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 9, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 29, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 19, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 18, 2004CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 17, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 19, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 3, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 27, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 29, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 7, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 9, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 9, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 18, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 16, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 16, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance