USPTO serial 75801710
NUTRASPHERE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NUTRASPHERE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CALGARY ALBERTA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN A. CLIFFORD
JOHN A CLIFFORD MERCHANT & GOULD PCP O BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Nutraceuticals for use as a dietary supplement containing oils, seeds, nuts, vitamins, minerals, herbs and protein in liquid, powder and capsule form; Wheat-based, flour-based, and dairy-based nutraceuticals for use as a dietary supplement; Dietary food supplements containing oils, seeds and nuts, namely, meal replacement bars and drinks; Vitamin, mineral and protein supplements containing oils, seeds and nuts; Baby food containing oils, seeds and nuts, namely, infant formula, cereal, cookies and biscuits | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Food products, namely, jams, jellies, peanut butter, fruit based snack food, vegetable and fruit salads, soups, soup mixes, olive oil, milk, yogurt, jellies, cream, butter, margarine, frozen meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables, processed nuts, processed edible seeds, cheese and potato chips; Dairy-based food beverages containing oils, seeds and nuts; Dairy based food beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Food products, namely, breakfast cereal, flour-based chips, grain-based chips, tortilla chips, crackers, biscuits, bread, muffins, ready to eat cereal derived food bars, cereal based snack food, granola-based snack bars, canned pasta, ketchup, mustard, relish, vinegar, honey, tomato sauces, barbeque sauces, table syrup, spices, ice milk, mayonnaise, candy, chocolate bars, chewing gum, ice cream, ice cream bars, sandwiches made of fish, hamburger, hot dogs, cheese, poultry, vegetables or meats, frozen meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; Processed wheat and wheat-based snack foods containing oils, seeds and nuts; Flour and flour-based chips containing oils, seeds and nuts; Non dairy-based food beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Fruit juices; Non-alcoholic fruit drinks; Soft drinks; Mineral, aerated and flavored waters; Vegetable juices and aerated fruit juices; Fruit flavored soft drinks; Fruit punch; Lemonade; Aloe vera drinks and juices; Wheat-based food beverages, namely, beer; Sweet cider, all containing oils, seeds and nuts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SemBioSys Genetics Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named NUTRASPHERE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 29, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |