USPTO serial 75802000
SKINY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3333065Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 13, 2007
- Examiner
- ALTREE, NICHOLAS
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SKINY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Huber Trikot - Josef Huber's Erben
A-6840 Gotzis, AT
Other trademarks owned by Huber Trikot - Josef Huber's Erben
Huber Trikot - Josef Huber's Erben
A-6840 Gotzis, AT
Other trademarks owned by Huber Trikot - Josef Huber's Erben
Huber Trikot - Josef Huber's Erben
A-6840 Gotzis, AT
Other trademarks owned by Huber Trikot - Josef Huber's Erben
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy A. French
TIMOTHY A FRENCH FISH & RICHARDSON PCPO BOX 1022MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | SWEATERS, SHIRTS, PAJAMAS, NEGLIGEES, NIGHTGOWNS, CARDIGAN JACKETS, VESTS, BLOUSES, PANTS, CHEMISES, BATHING SUITS, BATHING CAPS, JOGGING SUITS, TIGHTS, HOSIERY, AND UNDERWEAR | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Huber Trikot - Josef Huber's Erben
- Other trademarks owned by Huber Trikot - Josef Huber's Erben
- Other trademarks owned by Huber Trikot - Josef Huber's Erben
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named SKINY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 9, 2007 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 21, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 28, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 15, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 7, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |