USPTO serial 75802437
MERIDIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3152426Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 10, 2006
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MERIDIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Helsinki, FI
BELFAST BT9 9DT, GB
KAWASAKI-SHI, KANAGAWA-KEN, TOKYO, JP
KAWASAKI-SHI, KANAGAWA-KEN, TOKYO, JP
BELFAST BT9 9DT, GB
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT, NAMELY, PROTECTING, LOCATING, ACCESSING, CONTROLLING AND MANAGING DOCUMENTS IN ELECTRONIC FORM | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | [ COMPUTER PROGRAMMING AND APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT, AND COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING WEB SITES, ALL FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Teamware Group Oy
- Other trademarks owned by MERIDIO LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by FUJITSU LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by FUJITSU LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by MERIDIO LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MERIDIO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2012 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 30, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 11, 2006 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2004 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |