USPTO serial 75802515
SUMMER FUN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUMMER FUN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Golden Bright Manufacturer Ltd.
Tuen Mun, New Territories, HK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL D. SCHUMANN
MICHAEL D SCHUMANN MERCHANT & GOULD PCP O BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Toys and playthings, namely bubble making wands and bubble solution therefor, toy water guns, toy water sprayers, toy boats, toy airplanes, toy riding vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 30, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 14, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |