Drawing for LASTAR TELECOM

USPTO serial 75802675

LASTAR TELECOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HWANG, JOHN C B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LASTAR TELECOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JODY H ARMSTRONG

JODY H ARMSTRONG KILLWORTH GOTTMAN HAGAN & SCHAEFFONE DAYTON CTR STE 5001 S MAIN STDAYTON, OH 45402-2023

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038telecommunication and data services, namely, delivery of messages by electronic transmission, electronic mail services, electronic store-and-foward messaging, electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals, electronic transmission of facsimile communications and data featuring encryption and decryption, electronic transmission of messages and data, electronic voice messaging, namely, the recording, storage and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone, facsimile transmission, PBX dialing services, providing on-line electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users, providing frame relay connectivity services for data transfer, providing multiple user access to a global computer information network, providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network, rental of telecommunication equipment, ISDN services, telephone communication services, telephone voice messaging servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 11, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 1, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 6, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 5, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 13, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 13, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance