USPTO serial 75802694
ALIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BROOMFIELD, CO
Corporate Express Promotional Marketing, Inc.
St. Louis, MO
Other trademarks owned by Corporate Express Promotional Marketing, Inc.
BROOMFIELD, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SABRINA C STAVISH
SABRINA C STAVISH SHERIDAN ROSS PC1560 BROADWAY STE 1200DENVER, CO 80202-5141UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | WRITING PADS, PLANNERS, PERSONAL AND DAILY PLANNERS AND OFFICE ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, LETTER OPENERS, CALENDARS, PAPERCLIP HOLDERS, PEN AND PENCIL HOLDERS, PAPER HOLDERS, STAPLERS, STAPLER REMOVERS, TAPE DISPENSERS, OFFICE SUPPLY TRAYS, AND RULERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | ATHLETIC BAGS, TRAVEL BAGS, ATTACHE CASES, BRIEF-CASE PORTFOLIOS, AND UMBRELLAS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Corporate Express Promotional Marketing, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Similar marks named ALIGN
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 7, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 1, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 1, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 6, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 5, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |