Drawing for Serial No. 75802748

USPTO serial 75802748

Serial No. 75802748

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 75802748?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Frank B. Janoski

FRANK B JANOSKI LEWIS, RICE & FINGERSH, LC500 N BROADWAY STE 2000ST LOUIS, MO 63102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021slip-on beverage container holders for cans and bottlesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 28, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 28, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 29, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 10, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 8, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 20, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 27, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 15, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 30, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance