USPTO serial 75802990
DYNAMITE STORES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3532839Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 18, 2008
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DYNAMITE STORES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Quebec H4P IM2, CA
Quebec H4P IM2, CA
Quebec H4P IM2, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert M. O'Connell, Jr.
Robert M. O'Connell, Jr. Fish & Richardson, P.C.P.O. Box 1022Minneapolis, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Groupe Dynamite Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Groupe Dynamite Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Groupe Dynamite Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named DYNAMITE STORES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 2, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | ADBS | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS REQUESTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 17, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 27, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |