Drawing for INNOVATION IN UNDERSTANDING

USPTO serial 75803293

INNOVATION IN UNDERSTANDING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WAHLBERG, STACY B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INNOVATION IN UNDERSTANDING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dennis E. Stenzel

DENNIS E STENZEL CHERNOFF VILHAUER MCCLUNG & STENZEL601 SW 2ND AVE STE 1600PORTLAND, OR 97204-3157UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN DATABASE MANAGEMENT, AS A SPREADSHEET, FOR WORD AND TEXT PROCESSING, FOR TRANSLATIONS IN THE FIELD OF WORLD WIDE WEB TRANSLATIONS, CORPORATE DOCUMENT TRANSLATIONS AND FOREIGN LANGUAGE TRANSLATION AGENCIES; SOFTWARE FOR SPEECH AND LANGUAGE TECHNOLOGY, NAMELY, SPEECH PROCESSING SOFTWARE, DIALOGUE SOFTWARE USED FOR AUDIO AND VIDEO MINING SYSTEMS, CONVERSATIONAL SYSTEMS SUCH AS ORDERING SYSTEMS, CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND CALL CENTER APPLICATIONS, AND INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE FOR ELECTRONIC HELP SYSTEMSACTIVE—
035LICENSING OF COMPUTER SOFTWAREACTIVE—
038PROVIDING MULTIPLE USER ACCESS TO THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVE—
042COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS; UPDATING COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OTHERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 25, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 11, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 1, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 18, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 25, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 5, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 20, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 3, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 21, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 16, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance