USPTO serial 75803303
TWISTPAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TWISTPAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS E. BEALL, JR.
THOMAS E BEALL JR MATTINGLY, STANGER & MALUR, PC104 E HUME AVEALEXANDRIA, VA 22301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Packaging machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | wrapping paper and films used for industrial and commercial purposes for wrapping support trays with items to be packaged set thereon in order to fix the items to the support trays; cardboard; paperboard; paper boxes and cardboard boxes; cases made of paper and/or cardboard for receiving support trays holding items to be packaged; envelopes; cardboard mailing tubes; and cushioning and padding made of paper for packing purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | plastic film used as an industrial or commercial packing material and for wrapping support trays with items to be packaged set thereon in order to fix the items to the support trays; and plastic packaging material in the form of sheets or rolls for industrial and commercial purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |