USPTO serial 75803342
LAND PAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 15, 2002
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LAND PAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Compaction Technology (Soil) Ltd.
Harrow, Middlesex HA2 7HH, GB
Compaction Technology (Soil) Ltd.
Harrow, Middlesex HA2 7HH, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leslie Bertagnolli
LESLIE BERTAGNOLLI BAKER & MCKENZIEONE PRUDENTIAL PLZ130 E RANDOLPH DR STE 3500CHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machinery and power generated apparatus for soil-compacting, namely self-propelled impact rollers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 5, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 22, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |