USPTO serial 75803389
ACTIVE LIFE FOODS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACTIVE LIFE FOODS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sabrina C. Stavish
SABRINA C STAVISH SHERIDAN ROSS PC1560 BROADWAYSTE 1200DENVER, CO 80202-5141Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | PROCESSED BEEF, BOLOGNA, VEGETABLE-BASED AND SOY-BASED BEVERAGES USED AS MILK SUBSTITUTES, VEGETABLE BASED FOOD BEVERAGES, FISH, DAIRY BASED FOOD BEVERAGES, VEGETABLE BASED FOOD BEVERAGES, WHEY BASED FOOD BEVERAGES, SOY BASED FOOD BEVERAGES, FRANKFURTERS, FRUIT BASED SNACK FOOD, FRUIT PASTE, FRUIT BASED SPREADS, HAMBURGER, HOT DOGS, JERKY, LUNCHEON MEATS, SALAMI, SAUSAGE AND YOGURT | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | BAKERY GOODS, CEREAL BASED SNACK FOOD, READY-TO-EAT CEREAL DERIVED FOOD BARS, BREAKFAST CEREALS, CORN CHIPS, CRACKERS, MUFFINS, PASTA, GRANOLA BASED SNACK BARS AND CEREAL BASED SNACK BARS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Active Life Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Active Life Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named ACTIVE LIFE FOODS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 3, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 21, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 7, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 15, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 25, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |