USPTO serial 75803616
E
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 19, 2004
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with E?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Stamford, CT
Stamford, CT
DANONE WATERS OF AMERICA, INC.
WHITE PLAINS, NY
Stamford, CT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott E. Thompson
Scott E. Thompson Greenberg Traurig, LLP200 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10166UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, CAPS, TOPS AND T-SHIRTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GREAT BRANDS OF EUROPE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GREAT BRANDS OF EUROPE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DANONE WATERS OF AMERICA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GREAT BRANDS OF EUROPE, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named E
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 19, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 27, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 7, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 11, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 10, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 7, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |