USPTO serial 75803887
XPIRAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with XPIRAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
50015 Zaragoza, ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MOLLY BUCK RICHARD
MOLLY BUCK RICHARD THOMPSON & KNIGHT LLP1700 PACIFIC AVE STE 3300DALLAS, TX 75201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Programs for computer games | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |