USPTO serial 75803894
ACTIVE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY (ARMTECH)
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2916845Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 11, 2005
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, DAVID T
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ACTIVE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY (ARMTECH)?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chippendale NSW 2008, AU
Chippendale NSW 2008, AU
Chippendale NSW 2008, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alan T. Foster
Elizabeth A. Walker Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis LLPOne Lincoln StreetState Street Financial CenterBoston, MA 02111-2950Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use on corporate, institutional and scientific computer servers and computer systems, namely, software for use in scheduling, managing, monitoring and allocating system resources among one or more applications, users and collections thereof on that computer server or computer network, and user manuals and associated documentation sold as a unit therewith | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AUREMA PTY. LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by AUREMA PTY. LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by AUREMA PTY. LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ACTIVE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY (ARMTECH)
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 29, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 11, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 20, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 28, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 27, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |