Drawing for CELIGHT

USPTO serial 75804843

CELIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CELIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BETH M GOLDMAN

BETH M GOLDMAN HELLER EHRMAN WHITE & MCAULIFFE LLP333 BUSH STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-2878UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER HARDWARE, NAMELY, LINE PRINTED CIRCUIT CARDS, COMMON PRINTED CIRCUIT CARDS, MODEMS, NETWORK INTERFACE CARDS, OPERATIONAL NETWORK INTERFACE CARDS, NETWORK SWITCHES, CONTROLLERS, MODULATORS AND DEMODULATORS, HIGH PERFORMANCE FIBER OPTIC CABLE, LASER TRANSMITTERS AND RECEIVERS, AND NETWORK MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE, ALL FOR USE IN TELECOMMUNICATIONS, HIGH SPEED MULTIPLEXORS, DATA AGGREGATORS, DATA ACCESS, DATA TRANSPORT, COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK, AND STORAGE UNITS, NAMELY, CONTROL SHELVES AND MOUNTING SHELVES FOR MOUNTING DATA TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS WITHIN ENCLOSURES OR RACKSACTIVE—
038OPERATION AND MANAGEMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT AND NETWORKS FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, OPTICAL TRANSMISSION OF CARRIER DATA, INCLUDING VOICE AND DATA TRANSMISSIONACTIVE—
042CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS; TECHNICAL CONSULTING IN THE FIELD OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS; TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, TROUBLESHOOTING OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE, TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS, AND SYSTEMS INTEGRATION PROBLEMS VIA TELEPHONE, ONLINE, OR IN PERSONACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 3, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 26, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 26, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 4, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 26, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 18, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 18, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 19, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 25, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 5, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 18, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 29, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 25, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 25, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance