USPTO serial 75804968
IM INTRAMURALS.COM 'THE PREMIER COLLEGE INTRAMURAL SITE ON THE INTERNET.'
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IM INTRAMURALS.COM 'THE PREMIER COLLEGE INTRAMURAL SITE ON THE INTERNET.'?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kent E. Seton
PERRY J VISCOUNTYESQ. LATHAM & WATKINS650 TOWN CTR DRCOSTA MESA, CA 92626UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | PROVIDING INFORMATION FOR STUDENTS AND POTENTIAL STUDENTS REGARDING COLLEGE AND INTRAMURAL SPORTS VIA A WEB SITE ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING WEB SITES AND WEB PAGES FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES, FOR SUCH WEB SITES FEATURING INFORMATION REGARDING INTRAMURAL SPORTS OFFERED IN THE SCHOOLS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Intramurals.com
- Other trademarks owned by Intramurals.com
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named IM INTRAMURALS.COM 'THE PREMIER COLLEGE INTRAMURAL SITE ON THE INTERNET.'
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 17, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 30, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 28, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |