USPTO serial 75805007
SANCUBE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 20, 2001
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SANCUBE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence Ableman
LAWRENCE ABLEMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DATA STORAGE COMPUTER HARD DISK DRIVES FOR INTERCONNECTIVITY WITH A NETWORK OF ONE OR MORE COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 5, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 5, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 24, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |