USPTO serial 75805615
SECTV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEPHENS, SONYA B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SECTV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Birmingham, AL
Birmingham, AL
Atlanta, GA
Atlanta, GA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daphne Gronich
DAPHNE GRONICH FOX GROUPINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPTP O BOX 900BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90213Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MOTION PICTURE FILMS FEATURING ENTERTAINMENT RELATED TO SPORTS; PRE-RECORDED AUDIO TAPES, AUDIO CASSETTE TAPES AND AUDIO DISCS, ALL FEATURING ENTERTAINMENT RELATING TO SPORTS; PRE-RECORDED VIDEO TAPES, VIDEO CASSETTE TAPES AND VIDEO DISCS, ALL FEATURING ENTERTAINMENT RELATING TO SPORTS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROGRAMS FOR USE IN DATABASE MANAGEMENT IN THE FIELD OF SPORTS-RELATED ENTERTAINMENT AND INFORMATION; COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE; COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE RECORDED ON CD-ROM; COMPUTER GAME CASSETTES; COMPUTER GAME CARTRIDGES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Southeastern Conference
- Other trademarks owned by Southeastern Conference
- Other trademarks owned by SportsSouth Network, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by SportsSouth Network, Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SECTV
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 13, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 9, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |