USPTO serial 75805643
INCREDIBLE PIZZA COMPANY GREAT FOOD, FUN, FAMILY & FRIENDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 23, 2001
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INCREDIBLE PIZZA COMPANY GREAT FOOD, FUN, FAMILY & FRIENDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ROGERSVILLE, MO
INCREDIBLE PIZZA FRANCHISE GROUP, LLC
ROGERSVILLE, MO
Other trademarks owned by INCREDIBLE PIZZA FRANCHISE GROUP, LLC
Rogersville, MO
Rogersville, MO
Rogersville, MO
INCREDIBLE PIZZA FRANCHISE GROUP, LLC
Springfield, MO
Other trademarks owned by INCREDIBLE PIZZA FRANCHISE GROUP, LLC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Clapp
DONAL R DUNNER FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT & DUNNER LLP901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Restaurant services | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INCREDIBLE PIZZA CO., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by INCREDIBLE PIZZA FRANCHISE GROUP, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Barsness, Rick
- Other trademarks owned by Barsness, Rick
- Other trademarks owned by Barsness, Rick
- Other trademarks owned by INCREDIBLE PIZZA FRANCHISE GROUP, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named INCREDIBLE PIZZA COMPANY GREAT FOOD, FUN, FAMILY & FRIENDS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2018 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| May 1, 2018 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 1, 2018 | CTDD | CT DECISION: DISMISSED | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 21, 2011 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 7, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 8, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2004 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 21, 2004 | C.7C | NEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 31, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 31, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 29, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 7, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |