USPTO serial 75805827
E-ZPASS +
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with E-ZPASS +?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George B. Snyder
GEORGE B SNYDER KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LP919 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-3852UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Electronic payment services, namely accepting payments via an electronic transponder system linked to a customer's account for parking facility charges, transit charges, and for purchase of a full line of foods, beverages, retail merchandise and automotive services customarily available in connection with highway travel | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, The
- Other trademarks owned by Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, The
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named E-ZPASS +
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 22, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 28, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 8, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 6, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |