USPTO serial 75806124
INTEGRATING DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2577093Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 11, 2002
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, JAMES B
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INTEGRATING DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Irvine, CA
BEST BUY ENTERPRISE SERVICES, INC.
RICHFIELD, MN
Other trademarks owned by BEST BUY ENTERPRISE SERVICES, INC.
RICHFIELD, MN
Irvine, CA
RICHFIELD, MN
Irvine, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karen A. Brennan
Karen A. Brennan BBY Solutions, Inc.7601 Penn Avenue SouthCorp. Legal Dept., B6-143Richfield, MN 55423Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Audio-video systems integration services, specifically installation, maintenance and repair of integrated audio, video, lighting, telephone and security systems for residential and commercial environments | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 15, 1999 |
| 042 | Consultation and design to the specifications of others of integrated audio, video, lighting, telephone and security systems for residential and commercial environments | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 15, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AudioVisions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BEST BUY ENTERPRISE SERVICES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BBY SOLUTIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AudioVisions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BEST BUY STORES, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by AudioVisions, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named INTEGRATING DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 11, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 21, 2011 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 17, 2011 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 1, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |