Drawing for PNV

USPTO serial 75806292

PNV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILBERT, REBECCA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PNV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANDREW S. NEELY

NATHAN W JOHNSON BRADLEY ARANT ROSE & WHITE LLPINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPT1819 FIFTH AVE NBIRMINGHAM, AL 35203-2104

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009DOWNLOADABLE ELECTRONIC PUBLICATION, NAMELY, MAGAZINES FEATURING ARTICLES AND INFORMATION OF GENERAL INTEREST TO TRUCKERS DISSEMINATED BY MEANS OF A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORKACTIVE—
042COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING ON-LINE MAGAZINES FEATURING ARTICLES AND INFORMATION OF GENERAL INTEREST TO TRUCKERS DISSEMINATED BY MEANS OF A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORKACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 19, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2002EX3MSOU EXTENSION 3 DENIAL LETTER MAILED—
Oct 1, 2002EX3DSOU EXTENSION 3 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED—
Jan 7, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 31, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 18, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 18, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 18, 2001DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 3, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 15, 2001DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 11, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 9, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 14, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 13, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 15, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance