USPTO serial 75806298
PNV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PNV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Coral Springs, FL
Coral Springs, FL
Coral Springs, FL
Coral Springs, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREW S. NEELY
ANDREW S NEELY LUEDEKA, NEELY & GRAHAM PCP O BOX 1871KNOXVILLE, TN 37907UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing entertainment services, namely, distribution of television programming to cable television systems, a global computer network, and wireless television systems | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PNV Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by PNV.net, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by PNV.net, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by TTI Holdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named PNV
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 1, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 25, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 3, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |