Drawing for THE GARD SYSTEM

USPTO serial 75806596

THE GARD SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE GARD SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brent E. Ohlmann

BRENT E OHLMANN LAW OFFICE OF BRENT E. OHLMANN1730 PARK ST STE 210NAPERVILLE, IL 60563UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Vehicle safety device, namely an anti-roll stabilization system comprised of computer sensor controls that trigger a mechanical change in the vehicle's friction co-efficient to prevent roll overACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 11, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 24, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 14, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 14, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 4, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 27, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 6, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 20, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 19, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 23, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 27, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 5, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 3, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 22, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 2, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 18, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 20, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance