Drawing for DAILYAPPLE.COM

USPTO serial 75806600

DAILYAPPLE.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ENGEL, MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DAILYAPPLE.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JENNIFER E. BELL

JENNIFER E BELL PERKINS COIE LLP1201 THIRD AVE STE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98101-3099UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Medical services, namely, providing informational on-line newsletters or guides in the field of general medical issues, in the nature of medical news, medical opinion, medical advice, patient advice and medical reference materialsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 25, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 20, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 11, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 21, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 24, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 13, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 9, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 8, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 7, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 6, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 27, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION—
May 6, 2005IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
May 3, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 24, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2004ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Sep 14, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 6, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 27, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance