USPTO serial 75806672
A
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KELLY, JOHN M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with A?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBIN LIGHTNER MAISASHVILI
ROBIN LIGHTNER MAISASHVILI BAKER BOTTS LLPONE SHELL PLZ910 LOUISIANAHOUSTON, TX 77002-4995Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | RETAIL STORE SERVICES AND ONLINE RETAIL SERVICES VIA THE INTERNET FEATURING LUXURY GOODS, NAMELY, WATCHES, WATCH WINDERS, WATCHBANDS, CLOCKS, DIAMONDS, JEWELRY, HAIR ORNAMENTS, BELTS, WRITING ACCESSORIES, LEATHER GOODS, SUNGLASSES, HANDBAGS, TIES, CUMMERBUNDS, SCARVES, FRAGRANCES, BATH AND BODY PRODUCTS, CANDLES, CUFFLINKS, POCKET KNIVES, CRYSTAL ITEMS, CHINA, BARWARE, BAR ACCESSORIES, DISHES, FOOD SERVICE PIECES, CANDLEHOLDERS, ARTWORK, PICTURE FRAMES, PICTURE ALBUMS, SILVER AND PEWTER PIECES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 5, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |